For generations, four years has been the norm for an undergrad’s college career, but it is not hard to find a fifth, sixth, or seventh-year senior around campus (and they’re not necessarily real-life versions of Van Wilder).
This is all for good reason; there has been much more to learn and to grasp in the recent decades. The old standard of time it should take someone to earn their bachelor’s degree is not efficient to produce true experts in fields of study. For example, when Vernon M. Ingram discovered that the replacement of one amino acid for another causes biological disorders in 1957, people were attaining their degrees in an extremely watered down version of biology (compared to present time) in the same expected time frame given to students today.
Learning an enormously larger amount of information in the same amount of time as yesteryear is a ridiculous expectation that keeps perpetuating. Such entities as the “Be on Time” loan and the new state law setting a limit of dropped courses to six increases the pressure for a thorough college experience.
More time should be allowed for students of the new millennium, but the powers that be that offered the “Be on Time” loans are more concerned with saving their respective institutes’ money –money that’s not important enough to invest in the possibility of our college educations.
—Joshua Avelar